Averages ten 0–10 functional questions used in axial spondyloarthritis.
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Clinical Guide
Browse Knowledge HubAverages ten 0–10 functional questions used in axial spondyloarthritis.
Overview
Averages ten 0–10 functional questions used in axial spondyloarthritis.
Clinical Significance
Scores range from 0 to 10; higher values indicate greater functional limitation.
When to Use
- Use as structured clinical decision support when the required data are available and reliable.
How It Is Calculated
- The displayed variables are combined using the published equation or weighted point system.
Interpretation
- Scores range from 0 to 10; higher values indicate greater functional limitation.
Worked Example
Enter verified patient data in the displayed units; MedicalC applies the published equation or point system.
Limitations
- Classification and prognostic tools can be misapplied outside their validated population.
- Missing, estimated or non-contemporaneous data may materially change the result.
Clinical Pearls
- Document the input values, units, date and clinical setting with the result.
- Use serial scores only when the same instrument and measurement method are used consistently.
Common Mistakes
- Using the tool without confirming entry criteria.
- Selecting overlapping findings that should be represented by the highest-scoring item only.
- Treating a classification threshold as a standalone diagnosis.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this tool calculate?
Averages ten 0–10 functional questions used in axial spondyloarthritis.
Can this result be used alone?
No. Interpret it with the complete clinical assessment, applicable entry criteria and current guidance.
References
- Calin A et al. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2281-2285. — Primary or supporting reference for the implemented model.
Reviewed by: MedicalC Clinical Editorial Team
Last reviewed: July 2026
Clinical Disclaimer
MedicalC calculators and clinical tools are intended to support healthcare professionals. They do not replace clinical judgement, individual patient assessment, local guidance or specialist advice.
Results should always be interpreted in the context of the patient’s history, examination, investigations, current clinical condition and applicable professional guidance.