Estimates fetal weight from biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length using the Hadlock four-parameter equation.
Hadlock Four-Parameter Estimated Fetal Weight: Clinical Guide
Browse Knowledge HubEstimates fetal weight from biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length using the Hadlock four-parameter equation. This clinical guide covers appropriate use, calculation, interpretation, limitations and practical safeguards.
Overview
Estimates fetal weight from biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length using the Hadlock four-parameter equation.
Clinical Significance
Ultrasound estimated fetal weight has meaningful random and systematic error. Interpret against gestational-age standards, growth trend, measurement quality and the complete obstetric assessment.
When to Use
- Estimate fetal weight when all four ultrasound biometric measurements are available.
- Use measurements acquired using recognised obstetric ultrasound planes and technique.
- Assess the result against a locally adopted fetal-growth standard.
How It Is Calculated
- log10(EFW) = 1.3596 − 0.00386(AC×FL) + 0.0064HC + 0.00061(BPD×AC) + 0.0424AC + 0.174FL, with measurements in centimetres.
- The calculator validates the required inputs before applying the equation and rounds only the displayed result.
Interpretation
- Ultrasound estimated fetal weight has meaningful random and systematic error. Interpret against gestational-age standards, growth trend, measurement quality and the complete obstetric assessment.
- Review the component values and assumptions as well as the final result.
Worked Example
Enter clinically plausible values in the stated units. MedicalC applies: log10(EFW) = 1.3596 − 0.00386(AC×FL) + 0.0064HC + 0.00061(BPD×AC) + 0.0424AC + 0.174FL, with measurements in centimetres. Review the displayed result against the source data and the relevant clinical pathway.
Patient Considerations
- Confirm that the patient and clinical setting match the population or physiologic assumptions behind the equation.
- Consider whether treatment, organ function, pregnancy, body composition, sampling conditions or acute illness materially alter interpretation.
- Use serial calculations only when methods and units remain comparable.
Limitations
- Typical individual error can be clinically important, particularly at weight extremes.
- The equation is not a substitute for serial growth assessment.
- Incorrect units or biometric planes produce major errors.
Clinical Pearls
- All biometric inputs must be in centimetres.
- Review the percentile and growth trajectory, not the weight estimate alone.
- Recognise that management thresholds should account for the uncertainty of ultrasound EFW.
Common Mistakes
- Entering millimetres rather than centimetres.
- Using measurements from different examinations.
- Treating the estimate as an exact fetal weight.
Evidence Base
The implementation uses the published or established relationship: log10(EFW) = 1.3596 − 0.00386(AC×FL) + 0.0064HC + 0.00061(BPD×AC) + 0.0424AC + 0.174FL, with measurements in centimetres. The cited source should be reviewed alongside current specialty guidance before clinical deployment.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Hadlock Four-Parameter Estimated Fetal Weight calculator do?
Estimates fetal weight from biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length using the Hadlock four-parameter equation.
Can the result be used by itself?
No. The result is clinical decision support and must be interpreted with the source measurements, patient context and current guidance.
What most commonly makes the result unreliable?
Entering millimetres rather than centimetres.
When should the calculation be repeated?
Repeat it when a relevant input, sampling condition, treatment or clinical state changes.
Does the calculator replace direct measurement or specialist review?
No. Use direct measurement, validated software or specialist review whenever the clinical decision requires greater precision.
References
- Hadlock FP, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985. — Primary publication, authoritative guideline or recognised clinical source supporting the calculation.
Reviewed by: MedicalC Clinical Editorial Team
Last reviewed: July 2026
Clinical Disclaimer
MedicalC calculators and clinical tools are intended to support healthcare professionals. They do not replace clinical judgement, individual patient assessment, local guidance or specialist advice.
Results should always be interpreted in the context of the patient’s history, examination, investigations, current clinical condition and applicable professional guidance.
